Co-responsibility of four causes (p. 8)

In this page, Heidegger explains the co-responsibility of the four causes through the silver chalice. Telos governs the use of the item, while the silversmith is the logos which brings forth the item.

But there remains yet a third that is above all responsible for the sacrificial vessel. It is that which in advance confines the chalice within the realm of consecration and bestowal. [6] Through this the chalice is circumscribed as sacrificial vessel. Circumscribing gives bounds to the thing. With the bounds the thing does not stop; rather from out of them it begins to be what, after production, it will be. That which gives bounds, that which completes, in this sense is called in Greek telos, which is all too often translated as “aim” or “purpose,” and so misinterpreted. The telos is responsible for what as matter and for what as aspect are together co-responsible for the sacrificial vessel.
Finally there is a fourth participant in the responsibility for the finished sacrificial vessel’s lying before us ready for use, i.e., the silversmith – but not at all because he, in working, brings about the finished sacrificial chalice as if it were the effect of a making; the silversmith is not a causa efficiens.
The Aristotelian doctrine neither knows the cause that is named by this term nor uses a Greek word that would correspond to it.
The silversmith considers carefully and gathers together the three aforementioned ways of being responsible and indebted. To consider carefully [iiberlegen] is in Greek legin, logos. Legein is rooted in apophainesthni, to bring forward into appearance. The silversmith is co-responsible as that from whence the sacrificial vessel’s bringing forth and resting-in-self take and retrain their first departure. The three previously mentioned ways of being responsible owe thanks to the pondering of the silversmith for the “that” and the “how” of their coming into appearance and into play for the production of the sacrificial vessel.
Thus four ways of being responsible hold sway in the sacrificial vessel that lies ready before us. They differ from one another, yet they belong together. What unites them from the beginning? In what does this playing in unison of the four ways of being
Disclaimer:
This is a Digital Humanities project as part of the 02.132HT The Question of Technology course at the Singapore University of Technology and Design.
According to section 35 of the Singapore Copyright Act, up to 10% or an entire chapter may be reproduced for educational purposes.

Text - Previous

Causality (p. 7)

Next - Text

Hypokeisthai (p. 9)

Last modified 2yr ago

Copy link