The Question Concerning Technology
  • The Question Concerning Technology
  • đź“‘Summaries
    • The Essence of Technology (p. 3 - 12)
    • Enframing, the Essence of Modern Technology (p. 13 - 24)
    • The Danger and The Saving Power (p. 25 - 35)
  • đź§ľConcordances
    • Bringing
    • Danger
    • Destining
    • Enframing
    • Essence
    • Gestell
  • 📚Text
    • Questioning technology (p. 3)
    • Essence of technology (p. 4)
    • Definitions of technology (p. 5)
    • The four causes (p. 6)
    • Causality (p. 7)
    • Co-responsibility of four causes (p. 8)
    • Hypokeisthai (p. 9)
    • PoiÄ“sis (p. 10)
    • Bringing-forth (p. 11)
    • Revealing (p. 12)
    • TechnÄ“ and bringing-forth (p. 13)
    • Modern technology (p. 14)
    • Setting-upon (p. 15)
    • Challenging revealing (p. 16)
    • Standing-reserve (p. 17)
    • Ordering revealing (p. 18)
    • Ge-stell (p. 19)
    • Enframing (p. 20)
    • Revealing in modern technology (p. 21)
    • Modern technology and physics (p. 22)
    • The rule of enframing (p. 23)
    • Destining (p. 24)
    • The clearing (p. 25)
    • The danger (p. 26)
    • Concealment of revealing (p. 27)
    • The saving power (p. 28)
    • Enframing and destining (p. 29)
    • Essence (p. 30)
    • Destining is a granting (p. 31)
    • Granting is the saving power (p. 32)
    • The mystery of all revealing (p. 33)
    • TechnÄ“ (p. 34)
    • Reflection and questioning (p. 35)
  • Footnotes
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Text

Standing-reserve (p. 17)

In this page, Heidegger christens the things ordered to stand by as the "standing-reserve". They are no longer objects, having been challenged forth to unlock and expose their energies within.

PreviousChallenging revealing (p. 16)NextOrdering revealing (p. 18)

Last updated 5 years ago

What kind of unconcealment is it, then, that is peculiar to that which comes to stand forth through this setting-upon that challenges? Everywhere everything is ordered to stand by, to be immediately at hand, indeed to stand there just so that it may be on call for a further ordering. Whatever is ordered about in this way has its own standing. We call it the standing-reserve [Bestand]. The word expresses here something more, and something more essential, than mere “stock.” The name “standing-reserve” assumes the rank of an inclusive rubric. It designates nothing less than the way in which everything presences that is wrought upon by the challenging revealing. Whatever stands by in the sense of standing-reserve no longer stands over against us as object.

Yet an airliner that stands on the runway is surely an object. Certainly. We can represent the machine so. But then it conceals itself as to what and how it is. Revealed, it stands on the taxi strip only as standing-reserve, inasmuch as it is ordered to ensure the possibility of transportation. For this it must be in its whole structure and in every one of its constituent parts, on call for duty, i.e., ready for takeoff. (Here it would be appropriate to discuss Hegel’s definition of the machine as an autonomous tool. When applied to the tools of the craftsman, his characterization is correct. Characterized in this way, however, the machine is not thought at all from out of the essence of technology within which it belongs. Seen in terms of the standing-reserve, the machine is completely unautonomous, for it has its standing only from the ordering of the orderable.)

The fact that now, wherever we try to point to modem technology as the challenging revealing, the words “setting-upon,” “ordering,” “standing-reserve,” obtrude and accumulate in a dry, monotonous, and therefore oppressive way, has its basis in what is now coming to utterance.

Disclaimer:

This is a Digital Humanities project as part of the 02.132HT The Question of Technology course at the Singapore University of Technology and Design.

According to section 35 of the Singapore Copyright Act, up to 10% or an entire chapter may be reproduced for educational purposes.

📚
[16]