The Question Concerning Technology
  • The Question Concerning Technology
  • 📑Summaries
    • The Essence of Technology (p. 3 - 12)
    • Enframing, the Essence of Modern Technology (p. 13 - 24)
    • The Danger and The Saving Power (p. 25 - 35)
  • 🧾Concordances
    • Bringing
    • Danger
    • Destining
    • Enframing
    • Essence
    • Gestell
  • 📚Text
    • Questioning technology (p. 3)
    • Essence of technology (p. 4)
    • Definitions of technology (p. 5)
    • The four causes (p. 6)
    • Causality (p. 7)
    • Co-responsibility of four causes (p. 8)
    • Hypokeisthai (p. 9)
    • Poiēsis (p. 10)
    • Bringing-forth (p. 11)
    • Revealing (p. 12)
    • Technē and bringing-forth (p. 13)
    • Modern technology (p. 14)
    • Setting-upon (p. 15)
    • Challenging revealing (p. 16)
    • Standing-reserve (p. 17)
    • Ordering revealing (p. 18)
    • Ge-stell (p. 19)
    • Enframing (p. 20)
    • Revealing in modern technology (p. 21)
    • Modern technology and physics (p. 22)
    • The rule of enframing (p. 23)
    • Destining (p. 24)
    • The clearing (p. 25)
    • The danger (p. 26)
    • Concealment of revealing (p. 27)
    • The saving power (p. 28)
    • Enframing and destining (p. 29)
    • Essence (p. 30)
    • Destining is a granting (p. 31)
    • Granting is the saving power (p. 32)
    • The mystery of all revealing (p. 33)
    • Technē (p. 34)
    • Reflection and questioning (p. 35)
  • Footnotes
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Text

Concealment of revealing (p. 27)

In this page, Heidegger elaborates on the danger of destining. It drives out other forms of revealing, and conceals poiēsis. Regulating and securing of the standing-reserve now marks all revealing.

PreviousThe danger (p. 26)NextThe saving power (p. 28)

Last updated 5 years ago

object, but does so, rather, exclusively as standing-reserve, and man in the midst of objectlessness is nothing but the orderer of the standing-reserve, then he comes to the very brink of a precipitous fall; that is, he comes to the point where he himself will have to be taken as standing-reserve. Meanwhile man, precisely as the one so threatened, exalts himself to the posture of lord of the earth. In this way the impression comes to prevail that everything man encounters exists only insofar as it is his construct. This illusion gives rise in turn to one final delusion: It seems as though man everywhere and always encounters only himself. Heisenberg has with complete correctness pointed out that the real must present itself to contemporary man in this way. In truth, however, precisely nowhere does man today any longer encounter himself, i.e., his essence. Man stands so decisively in attendance on the challenging-forth of Enframing that he does not apprehend Enframing as a claim, that he fails to see himself as the one spoken to, and hence also fails in every way to hear in what respect he ek-sists, from out of his essence, in the realm of an exhortation or address, and thus can never encounter only himself.

But Enframing does not simply endanger man in his relationship to himself and to everything that is. As a destining, it banishes man into that kind of revealing which is an ordering. Where this ordering holds sway, it drives out every other possibility of revealing. Above all, Enframing conceals that revealing which, in the sense of poiēsis, lets what presences come forth into appearance. As compared with that other revealing, the setting-upon that challenges forth thrusts man into a relation to that which is, that is at once antithetical and rigorously ordered. Where Enframing holds sway, regulating and securing of the standing-reserve mark all revealing. They no longer even let their own fundamental characteristic appear, namely, this revealing as such.

Thus the challenging Enframing not only conceals a former way of revealing, bringing-forth, but it conceals-revealing itself and with it That wherein unconcealment, i.e., truth, comes to pass.

:

“Das Naturbild,” pp. 60 ff.

📚
*
*