The Question Concerning Technology
  • The Question Concerning Technology
  • đź“‘Summaries
    • The Essence of Technology (p. 3 - 12)
    • Enframing, the Essence of Modern Technology (p. 13 - 24)
    • The Danger and The Saving Power (p. 25 - 35)
  • đź§ľConcordances
    • Bringing
    • Danger
    • Destining
    • Enframing
    • Essence
    • Gestell
  • 📚Text
    • Questioning technology (p. 3)
    • Essence of technology (p. 4)
    • Definitions of technology (p. 5)
    • The four causes (p. 6)
    • Causality (p. 7)
    • Co-responsibility of four causes (p. 8)
    • Hypokeisthai (p. 9)
    • PoiÄ“sis (p. 10)
    • Bringing-forth (p. 11)
    • Revealing (p. 12)
    • TechnÄ“ and bringing-forth (p. 13)
    • Modern technology (p. 14)
    • Setting-upon (p. 15)
    • Challenging revealing (p. 16)
    • Standing-reserve (p. 17)
    • Ordering revealing (p. 18)
    • Ge-stell (p. 19)
    • Enframing (p. 20)
    • Revealing in modern technology (p. 21)
    • Modern technology and physics (p. 22)
    • The rule of enframing (p. 23)
    • Destining (p. 24)
    • The clearing (p. 25)
    • The danger (p. 26)
    • Concealment of revealing (p. 27)
    • The saving power (p. 28)
    • Enframing and destining (p. 29)
    • Essence (p. 30)
    • Destining is a granting (p. 31)
    • Granting is the saving power (p. 32)
    • The mystery of all revealing (p. 33)
    • TechnÄ“ (p. 34)
    • Reflection and questioning (p. 35)
  • Footnotes
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  1. Text

Destining is a granting (p. 31)

In this page, Heidegger mulls over the possibility of destining being a granting. Since destining for all revealing brings forth that which endures, hence it can be called a granting.

PreviousEssence (p. 30)NextGranting is the saving power (p. 32)

Last updated 5 years ago

the permanent enduring of an Idea that hovers over everything technological, thus making it seem that by technology we mean some mythological abstraction? The way in which technology essences lets itself be seen only from out of that permanent enduring in which Enframing comes to pass as a destining of revealing. Goethe once uses the mysterious word fortgewähren [to grant permanently] in place of fortwähren [to endure permanently]. He hears währen [to endure] and gewähren [to grant] here in one unarticulated accord. And if we now ponder more carefully than we did before what it is that actually endures and perhaps alone endures, we may venture to say: Only what is granted endures. That which endures primaily out of the earliest beginning is what grants.

As the essencing of technology, Enframing is that which endures. Does Enframing hold sway at all in the sense of granting? No doubt the question seems a horrendous blunder. For according to everything that has been said, Enframing is, rather, a destining that gathers together into the revealing that challenges forth. Challenging is anything but a granting. So it seems, so long as we do not notice that the challenges-forth into the ordering of the real as standing-reserve still remains a destining that starts man upon a way of revealing. As this destining, the coming to presence of technology gives man entry into That which, of himself, he can neither invent nor in any way make. For there is no such thing as a man who, solely of himself, is only man.

But if this destining, Enframing, is the extreme danger, not only for man’s coming to presence, but for all revealing as such, should this destining still be called a granting? Yes, most

:

“Die Wahlverwandtschaften” [Congeniality], pt. II, chap. 10, in the novelette Die wunderlichen Nachbarskinder [The strange neighbor’s children].

📚
*
*
[24]
[25]